The Enterprise Blog

Author Archive

Andrew G. Biggs: “The truth about college aid: It’s corporate welfare
Christopher J. Conover and Jerry Ellig: “Healthcare plan rebates have hidden costs
Marc A. Thiessen: “Bob McDonnell’s national security problem
Frederick M. Hess: “The chronicle of double standards
Edward J. Pinto: “FHA Watch, May 2012
Norman J. Ornstein and Thomas E. Mann: “Want to end partisan politics? Here’s what won’t work — and what will
Sasha Gordon: “Suicide bombing in Yemen’s capital kills 90

Arthur C. Brooks: “True fairness means rewarding merit, not spreading the wealth
Alex J. Pollock: “JPMorgan and the conceptual confusion of the Volcker rule
Michael Barone: “Obama pursues higher tax rates, growth be damned
Frederick M. Hess: “You must focus on long-term solutions

Gary J. Schmitt and Patrick Keller: “Revitalizing the Atlantic Alliance
Scott Gottlieb, M.D.: “Healthcare consolidation and competition after PPACA
Roger Bate: “Delhi’s drug regulation overdose
Jonah Goldberg: “Generation pap
Lawrence B. Lindsey: “Why Washington hates Jamie Dimon

John H. Makin: “The euro end game
Karin Agness: “Congratulations, grad, you’re unemployed
Sadanand Dhume: “Winning Sri Lanka’s peace
Arthur Herman: “Obama’s fatal flaw revealed in White House website’s presidential bios

American Enterprise Institute: “Defense vs. entitlement spending: A look at the trends
Desmond Lachman: “Mr. Obama’s Greek challenge
Michael Barone: “Rattled Obama team making miscues
Peter J. Wallison: “The Volcker rule would not have prevented JP Morgan Chase’s $2 billion loss
Steven F. Hayward: “Unconventional energy meets conventional politics: Which will win?
Jonah Goldberg: “Romney’s media handicap
James C. Capretta: “Identifying opportunities for health care delivery system reform
Norman J. Ornstein: “Research cuts are akin to eating seed corn
Kenneth P. Green: “Gasoline prices: Why so high and what to do?

Peter J. Wallison: “An out-of-proportion outcry to JPMorgan’s loss
Marc A. Thiessen: “Mr. President, please don’t kill this terrorist
Karlyn Bowman and Andrew Rugg: “What did the public think about taxes in 2011?
Frederick M. Hess: “Making the grade
John R. Bolton: “Against the globalistas
Kenneth P. Green: “The continuing failure of green conceit
Sally Satel: “Are you dead yet?

Kevin A. Hassett and Dean Baker: “The human disaster of unemployment
Thomas Donnelly and Gary J. Schmitt: “Panetta plays chicken
Michael Barone: “Three different ways to look at the 2012 campaign
Arthur C. Brooks: “Uncle Sam or Uncle Sugar?
Daniel Vajdic: “Putin’s growing detachment from the West — and reality
Roger Bate, Aparna Mathur, and Ginger Zhe Jin: “Counterfeit or substandard?
Alan D. Viard: “Taxing state governments under a federal value added tax: Part 1
Aparna Mathur and Alex Brill: “Elizabeth Warren has used shoddy evidence before
Michael Auslin: “Where did the land go?

Marc A. Thiessen: “Sorry, Joe, most of Iran’s nuclear progress has come under Obama
Jonah Goldberg: “‘Money primary’
Thomas Donnelly: “Romney defense spending proposal a return to normal
Maseh Zarif: “Stop giving Iran a pass

Arthur Herman: “The FDR lesson Obama should follow
Mackenzie Eaglen: “Entitlement programs, not defense, the source of deficit crisis
Steven F. Hayward: “Barry Goldwater vindicated
Thomas P. Miller: “Health care: Real reform, not phony federalism
Sadanand Dhume and Julissa Milligan: “India’s broken schools, cloudy future
Mackenzie Eaglen: “Green Berets’ value is proven in war on drugs
Alex J. Pollock: “Heed a banking champion’s words on loan loss reserves
Roger Scruton: “Conservatism and climate
Sasha Gordon: “Al Qaeda in Yemen remains a threat

Karlyn Bowman, Jennifer K. Marsico, and Andrew Rugg: “A new phase of the 2012 campaign
Arthur C. Brooks: “America and the value of ‘earned success’
Mackenzie Eaglen: “Sequestration is more likely than you think
Scott Gottlieb, M.D.: “The Obama health plan will squeeze the middle class
Jonah Goldberg: “Romney feeds the crocs
Norman J. Ornstein: “Shaky export-import bank deal no portent of process
Arthur Herman: “Why the death of Europe is America’s opportunity
John R. Bolton: “Dangerous fallout from China’s Chen affair
Katherine Zimmerman: “Al Qaeda’s Yemen-based affiliate is alive and well

Arthur C. Brooks: “First, make the moral case for free enterprise
Sally Satel, M.D.: “Facebook’s organ donation success needs follow-up
Jon Entine: “Natural disasters: Who pays in the climate change era?
Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee: “Two cheers for the JOBS Act
John R. Bolton: “The meaning of Sunday’s European elections
Marc A. Thiessen: “10 burning questions for Obama’s secret terrorist release program
Katherine Zimmerman: “Al Shabaab in decline?

Danielle Pletka and Gary J. Schmitt: “Zzzzzzz, Hollande
Thomas Donnelly, Gary J. Schmitt and Mackenzie Eaglen: “Sequestration must be stopped
Christina Hoff Sommers: “The case against the Paycheck Fairness Act
Jon Entine: “DNA links prove Jews are a ‘race,’ says genetics expert
Leon Aron: “A Kremlin made of sand
Michael Barone: “Warren ancestry claim puts light on corrupt system
Roger F. Noriega: “Castro’s desperate warning
Sadanand Dhume: “Bangladesh is South Asia’s standard-bearer
Dan Blumenthal and Lara Crouch: “Friends like these

Leon R. Kass: “The other war on poverty: Finding meaning in America
Andrew G. Biggs: “College grads need jobs, not a lower loan rate
Michael Auslin: “The Chen debacle
Jon Entine: “Republicans are stupid…
John Yoo: “Litigating for terrorists
Michael Auslin: “Don’t forget about the East China Sea

Dan Blumenthal: “A strong military keeps the threat of war small
Andrew Biggs: “Public pension stimulus nonsense
Michael Auslin: “Japan awakens
Roger Bate: “How entrepreneurs are leading the fight against fake pharmaceuticals
John R. Bolton: “Mysteries of Oslo
Lazar Berman: “Top 5 myths surrounding the bin Laden raid

One year after Osama bin Laden was killed by U.S. Navy SEAL Team Six, President Obama traveled to Afghanistan to sign an agreement to remain engaged in Afghanistan after U.S. combat forces come home in 2014. The president also acknowledged that American diplomats are directly engaged with the Taliban. AEI scholars Dany Pletka and John Yoo, as well as key lawmakers and CIA Director General Michael Hayden, weigh in on the aftermath of bin Laden’s death and what it means for the U.S. military, global security, and the president’s re-election. Hover over each name below to see their contribution.

Former director of the Central Intelligence Agency General Michael Hayden was asked to weigh in on the death of Osama bin Laden, one year later, as a part of the Enterprise blog’s latest symposium.

Here is a great American victory, the product of more than a decade of relentless pursuit by American intelligence. Political debates about who would have made what decision cheapen the memory and obscure the significance of the entire matter. The president made a gutsy call, no question. But it is one that I think ANY American president would have made. And as far as al Qaeda goes, the raid is a powerful message to potential jihadists surfing radical web sites that these guys (that’s us) have great reach, great precision and—above all—very long memories.

AEI’s interview with House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon is a part of the Enterprise blog’s latest symposium: Death of Osama bin Laden, one year later.

Q: What do you believe killing bin Laden achieved?

Chairman McKeon: Killing Osama bin Laden brought final justice to a terrorist leader who murdered thousands of innocent people around the world. He can no longer threaten the American people. That’s important. Terrorism is an ideological fight. Some of his followers believed he was invincible, and he served as an inspirational leader for the broader al Qaeda movement. So stripping away the mythology and mystique that Bin Laden’s followers built around him is important, so long as we remember he left a potent, global terrorist network in place.

Q: Is Al Qaeda finished?

Chairman McKeon: No. While Al Qaeda has certainly sustained heavy losses since 2001, they remain the number one threat to the United States. Their ideology continues to thrive in places like Yemen, Somalia, Algeria, and Iraq and remains a grave threat to America. Many of the recent foiled terror plots against the United States homeland have originated from Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in Yemen. As long as these groups exist, we must continue to defend forward, keeping sustained pressure on terrorist groups. We also must continue to monitor and be watchful of terror groups in western Pakistan like the Haqqani network that continue to attack American troops, seek to destabilize Afghanistan, and has served as one of the most important protectors of al Qaeda leadership in Pakistan.

Q: Will we have the kind of military we need to catch the next bin Laden?

Chairman McKeon: I am confident that our military and intelligence community are focused on preventing the emergence of another bin Laden rather than catching the next one. However, I am concerned that the defense cuts resulting from sequestration could damage our most important capabilities in that fight. Sequestration represents an across-the-board cut to those sectors of our military most critical to fighting and preventing terrorism like special forces, intelligence, unmanned aircraft, and our naval forces, to name a few. It simply is not in our interest or safety to allow sequestration to stand, and we must take immediate action to ensure that we prevent those cuts from taking place.

Q: What do you think of the recent political uproar over political ads and claims of personal credit by the president?

Chairman McKeon: President Obama should be applauded for ordering the mission to kill Osama bin Laden. But members of the intelligence community have worked themselves to the bone trying to find and eliminate him. And it was the SEALs who risked their lives bringing him to justice. I’d be far more comfortable if the president acknowledged that this was a team effort, spanning two administrations, and various parts of the military and defense communities.

AEI’s interview with Congressman Mike Turner is a part of the Enterprise blog’s latest symposium: Death of Osama bin Laden, one year later.

What do you believe killing bin Laden achieved?

Bringing bin Laden to justice serves as an important milestone in the eyes of Americans. This is an individual who murdered thousands of innocent civilians across the globe. The fact that our servicemembers, intelligence, and law enforcement agencies did not stop their search, to have him answer for his crimes, serves as a warning to those who continue to seek to harm our citizens and our way of life. Our nation is one which has never backed down from a challenge and has risen to confront evil in whatever form it takes.

Will we have the kind of military we need to catch the next bin Laden?

The attacks of September 11th and the now Global War on Terror have significantly changed our armed forces and the role they play in the defense of our nation. We have become more agile and better integrated across services. The raid that brought bin Laden to justice was a joint operation which utilized military assets as well as those of our intelligence community. We are dealing with groups which have no borders or uniforms. This continued innovation and cooperation amongst our national security structure is part of the future of our country’s defense.

What do you think of the recent political uproar over political ads and claims of personal credit by the president?

The president has every right to discuss what he has done in office. However, using a moment which unified the nation, where Americans came together to celebrate a terrorist being brought to justice, to divide us rather than unite us, is deplorable. The men and women who worked for years to find bin Laden didn’t carry out their mission as Republicans or Democrats, but as Americans. He shouldn’t be diminishing their efforts by using them as an election year ploy.

AEI’s interview with Congressman Allen West is a part of the Enterprise blog’s latest symposium: Death of Osama bin Laden, one year later.

Q: What do you believe the killing of Osama bin Laden achieved?

Congressman West: In a tactical sense, the achievement was that you took out the current leader or a figurehead for al Qaeda. But in a larger strategic sense, it doesn’t mean as much because the organization is still around and you know, we have to be concerned about the potential of body bombs being used on our aircraft. So we can’t be focused on this, it was a great thing that happened, all the credit goes to our men in Navy Seal uniforms that went across the border in that late night raid operation. But we still have to stay focused on—like the State Department official said—on the war on terrorism, which is a hollow misnomer, it is not over.

Q: Do you think, as some have suggested, “that the war on terrorism is over,” that al Qaeda is finished?

Congressman West: Well, this is why I get kind of upset—we are really narrowing the focus. Al Qaeda is just one terrorist organization. We have to realize that before al Qaeda, the Islamic terrorist organization that inflicted the most causalities on America was Hezbollah. So just because you are focused on al Qaeda… what about Hezbollah? What about Hamas? What about al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade? What about the al-Quds Brigade? What about the Muslim Brotherhood? What about Jamaat al-Islamiyya? What about Abu Sayyaf? We can go on ad nauseum. At a strategic level, we really are missing out on who we are fighting against, we are trying to narrow it down to one specific organization, which would be just like saying the United States of America is fighting about one infantry battalion.

Q: Do you believe that the United States has appropriately addressed the fact that bin Laden was found, having lived many years, just outside of Islamabad?

Congressman West: We have not appropriately looked at that. We have not appropriately dealt with the sanctuaries of the enemy that are within Pakistan. We all know that the Haqqani network, which is probably inflicting the most casualties right now, is right across the border in Pakistan and is operating freely. We have to be honest about the fact that now we come to find out that Osama bin Laden was bouncing around all over Pakistan for the last five to six years or so, we have to be serious about denying enemy sanctuaries wherever he is, we have to cordon off his ability to have a sphere of influence, and we have to win the information operations propaganda war, and we have got to, from a strategic level, cut off his men, material, and financial support. Those are the critical types of strategic level objectives that we should be looking at.

Q: Why do you think it took so long to find bin Laden? Do you think we failed to devote sufficient resources to the hunt?

Congressman West: I can’t make that assessment because I don’t know what resources were allocated to it. Look, you were looking for a needle in a haystack. So you were piecing together many different leads and trying to pull this operation together. I think that when we did get the right, actionable intelligence and the 75-80% confirmed solution, our special operators did a magnificent job. These things are not very easy to do and when you go back and think about how during the Carter administration we gutted our CIA and those intelligence gathering capabilities and we had to be able to infiltrate some of these organizations—it was very hard to get them built back up.

Q: It is hard to know whether we devoted the appropriate resources, because so much was invisible to us. But right now we are seeing unprecedented disinvestment in our military. Do you think that the current trends in investment in the military and in all of our forces are going to have an impact on our ability to conduct these kind of operations in the future?

Congressman West: Absolutely. We are going in the wrong direction. This belief coming out of the State Department that the war on terrorism is over… you see a commander in chief in President Obama that is really not concerned about these additional sequestration cuts that could hit the military, that take us down to somewhat post-World War I levels when you see more volatility in the world right now. Strategically, we are not going in the right direction—you can’t take your Army from 45 combat brigade formations down to 32; you can’t take your Marine Corps down to 181,000, or take your Navy down to 230 naval war vessels when in the 1990s we were at 570. And you are cutting nine Air Force fighter squadrons. We are really not sitting down and doing what a prudent commander in chief would do, which is look at the geographical areas of responsibility and lay out the breadth of those AORs for the next 10-15 years and develop the right type of requirements, capabilities, and capacities to meet those threats. You can’t make the military the bill payer for the fiscal irresponsibility of Washington, DC. The defense budget is only about 19.4%; the true drivers of our debt are the mandatory spending programs—Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and the net interest on the debt—and that’s what we should be focused on.

Q: What is your view on the politicization of the capture of bin Laden and some of the recent uproar over Obama’s trip to Afghanistan and the ad that he cut claiming credit and saying Romney would not have done it?

Congressman West: I don’t know the inside baseball of what happened with that decision but I think that the Navy Seals said it best: Any president would have gone for the green light. I have been on operations and you know, there are many things that go on that presidents don’t know about and the men and women in uniform are the ones who get on the helicopter, they are the ones who get in the Stryker vehicles, the Humvees, and they execute these operations. I think that the most important thing is that, kind of like what coach Lou Holtz used to say: When you score a touchdown, you just act like you have been there before, that is a part of being a quiet professional, and I think that is what our men and women in uniform, especially our Navy Seals, would appreciate.

I find it very funny because you know, in the Bush/Cheney administration, there were liberal pundits like Keith Olbermann, who used to refer to Seal Team 6 as Dick Cheney’s “little black death squad.” But now all of a sudden they want to embrace them and they want to promote them. I think that having been a soldier for 22 years, we can sniff out a fake and a phony and a person who is disingenuous.

Q: Congressman West, anything else you would like to add?

Congressman West: I think the most important thing is that we really don’t have a national security strategy, we don’t have an energy strategy, we don’t have an economic strategy, and that is what concerns me the most. We are just floating along day by day in this country. Eventually, if you are a ship without a rudder or a captain at the helm and you are in a maelstrom, you may get tossed against the rocks. I don’t want to see this country get tossed against the rocks.

Jonah Goldberg: “Do Republicans have bad brains?
Marc A.Thiessen: “Ex-CIA counterterror chief says Pelosi ‘reinventing the truth’ about waterboarding
Norman J. Ornstein and Thomas E. Mann: “Let’s just say it: The Republicans are the problem
Frederick M. Hess: “The sorry Stafford panderfest
John Bolton: “Iran and Obama’s Syria hesitation
Jon Entine: “Can the EPA fairly regulate the shale gas revolution?
Reza Jan: “Pakistan’s federal felon

Dan Blumenthal: “The great China crack-up
Jonah Goldberg: “The top five clichés liberals use to avoid real arguments
Michael Auslin: “Flying not quite as high
Kevin Hassett: “The new age of anxiety
Mackenzie Eaglen: “Coming soon to your town: Sequestration road tour
Michael Barone: “Obama losing rock star status with young
Roger Noriega: “Venezuela’s narco-conspiracy
Michael Auslin: “Lessons from Byzantium

Peter Wallison and Edward Pinto: “How government policies brought down the housing market
John Yoo: “On judicial review—President Obama seems to understand it poorly
Thomas P. Miller, Grace-Marie Turner, and James C. Capretta: “Why the (un)Affordable Care Act should be repealed and replaced
Sadanand Dhume: “Down with India’s old guard pols

Michael Barone: “Shrinking problem
Matthew H. Jensen and Veronika Polakova: “What if we had overhauled our tax code?
John Yoo: “Waiting for the UN
Jonah Goldberg: “Obama’s tainted blunder
Frederick M. Hess: “Philanthropy in the ring
Norman J. Ornstein: “Broadcasters betray trust with Citizens United
Andrew Biggs: “A payroll tax cut could help Social Security

Henry Olsen: “Why Medicare’s failure matters
Nick Schulz: “Wal-Mart and the legal bribery problem in the United States
Norman J. Ornstein: “The Mega Millions solution
Kevin A. Hassett: “The stubbornest tax
Paul Wolfowitz: “An old myth that is an obstacle to a new future
Marc A. Thiessen: “A bishop’s unjust attack on Paul Ryan
Michael Rubin: “Iran debates, rejects talks with U.S.

5 ideas for saving Medicare

By The Editors

April 24, 2012, 11:09 am

Monday’s release of the annual Medicare Trustees’ report seems on the face of things to be a simple exercise in dry accounting—trust fund x will run out of money in year y. In fact, it’s much more than that. It’s an annual reminder we’ve made promises to future seniors that we can’t afford to keep — at least not without sweeping reform.

Hover over the photo below to kick around some ideas from AEI scholars about ways to reform the collapsing system:


The American Enterprise Institute takes no institutional positions on policy advocacy or political campaigns. The views expressed on The Enterprise Blog represent those of the individual writers.

AEI