On Thursday, the Food and Drug Administration will decide whether cocktail HIV therapy Truvada, made by U.S. drug company Gilead, should be approved for use as a preventative drug. If the FDA grants approval, Truvada will be the first HIV drug to be used prophylactically.
Opinion is divided over the application. Some balk at the cost: the current treatment regimen costs $14,000 per patient per year. Others argue that the side effects (which are minimal compared to most other HIV drugs) are too problematic for widespread use. Still others argue that deploying a prophylactic drug will discourage condom use.
These are valid concerns, which means that targeted use by at-risk groups is probably most warranted. Anyone who has seen the effectiveness of Truvada will surely be pleased that more people are likely to have access to it.
The key question is who will pay for the drug in these straightened financial times, especially when the most sensible public health option is targeting those most at risk, which are those working illegally in the sex industry. I somehow doubt that the drug, if approved, will be deployed where it could do most good.
But that is a debate for later; right now the FDA should approve the drug for prophylactic use.

