The Enterprise Blog

Author Archive

Senator Chuck Grassley demanded a probe yesterday into the hiring practices of Infosys, one of the largest Indian IT companies providing services in the United States, which allegedly used the B-1 visa program to get around the strict H-1B program restrictions. B-1 is a visa issued to business visitors while the H-1B is a work visa sought by professionals with specialized skills that are offered a full-time job by a company operating in the United States. There is no limit to the number of B-1 visas that may be issued every year but the H-1B has strict requirements including a cap of 65,000 per year and payment of a dollar wage on par or higher than prevailing wages in the market. If Infosys violated any laws by employing workers at below-market rates for its American operations, the company should be held accountable and the appropriate individuals prosecuted.

However, this episode also highlights the need for a structural change in the legal immigration policies of the United States and the current administration. Firms pay the government fees in the range of $2,500 to $4,500 for every employee they petition to hire on an H-1B, in addition to bearing the cost of immigration attorney fees of approximately $2,000. Additionally, the cap of 65,000 visas is reached within a few hours of the first day petitions are accepted (April 1) in prosperous times, and within days or months even in a recession. The excessive fees, unfair caps, and other bureaucratic hoops described in this Fox News article are a hurdle to the free flow of skilled labor. The biggest losers from the H-1B restrictions are small firms, according to the recent Government Accountability Office report “H-1B Visa Program—Reforms Are Needed to Minimize the Risks and Costs of Current Program”:

Small firms were more likely to fill their positions with different (that is, less suitable) candidates, which they said resulted in delays and sometimes economic losses, particularly for firms in rapidly changing technology field.

The Fox News article also highlights how the Obama administration has exacerbated the problem:

President Obama signed the Making Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Border Security (P.L. 111-230) in August 2010. It placed an additional $2,000 fee on H-1B employers who employ 50 or more employees with more than 50 percent of its employees in the United States on H-1B or L visas. This law targets foreign information technology companies investing in the U.S.

It will only harm Americans in the long run if the government prevents companies from hiring skilled foreign workers who are increasing the nation’s productivity through their contribution to sectors in which America has a dearth of talent. The United States will become less productive and firms will move to countries with higher growth rates and a more hospitable immigration environment.

nastyThe September edition of the Lancet conferred upon New Delhi the dubious distinction of having a bacterium named after it. The “Indian Superbug,” or New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1 (NDM-1), is a bacterium carrying a newly recognized gene that is extremely immune to antibiotics. The Lancet study identified 143 cases of NDM-1 isolates in India (and Pakistan and Bangladesh) and 37 in the United Kingdom. The study claimed that many of the UK cases involved people who had traveled to India or Pakistan within the past year, or “had links” with these countries. However, the broader message being drawn from the study—that Indian hospitals are unsafe for surgery and health tourists should beware—lacks any foundation and makes us suspicious that this hype is instead an attempt to stigmatize the nation’s burgeoning medical tourism industry.

In fact, within days of the publication of the report, the paper’s Chennai-based lead author, Karthikeyan Kumarasamy, dissociated himself from parts of it, claiming that while he did the scientific work, inferences were made and published by his British counterparts without his consent. He told the Hindustan Times:

It’s all hype and not as bad as it sounds. The threat of the NDM-1 is not that big as, say, H1N1 (swine flu). The conclusion that the bacterium was transmitted from India is hypothetical. Unless we analyze samples from across the globe to trace its origin, we can only speculate.

This statement, in addition to the fact that the Lancet report was funded in part by competing pharmaceutical company Wyeth, has Indian hospitals and doctors up in arms about associating the enzyme with New Delhi. They believe that the move had more to do with decelerating the “outsourcing” of healthcare services to India rather than well-founded concerns among the Western medical research community.

Continue reading here.

Image by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

eastindiaWe thought it ironic and worth pointing out that The British East India Company, which paved the way for the military and political takeover of India by the British crown in 1857, was recently purchased by an Indian entrepreneur, Sanjiv Mehta. You can watch his interview on CNBC here.

Starting as a commercial outpost in India in the 1750s, trading in cotton, silk, indigo, dye, and tea, the company gradually came to rule large swathes of India. Under General Robert Clive, it waged wars against the Mughal rulers of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. Clive thus became the first governor general of Bengal. Over a 100-year period, from 1757 to 1857, the company consolidated its rule and functioned more as a nation than a trading firm. The revolution of 1857 finally ended company rule, and India came to be directly administered by the British crown.

The East India Company was involved in other revolutions around the world as well—The Opium Wars resulting in Britain’s seizure of Hong Kong (19th century) and the Boston Tea Party, the revolt against the tax on tea imported into America by the company and a key event leading to the American Revolution. All historic events in the tale of one of the largest multinational companies ever that was founded way back on December 31, 1600, to trade with the East Indies.

Aparna Mathur is a resident scholar at AEI, where Rohan Poojara is a research assistant.

Image by rillian.


The American Enterprise Institute takes no institutional positions on policy advocacy or political campaigns. The views expressed on The Enterprise Blog represent those of the individual writers.

AEI