The Enterprise Blog

Why getting a good education and a good job doesn’t necessarily mean going to a four-year college

By James Pethokoukis

December 30, 2011, 2:54 pm

As I mentioned earlier, I am currently reading Real Education by Charles Murray. In the book, Murray makes four big points: a) Ability varies; b) half of the children are below average; c) too many people are going to college; and d) America’s future depends on how we educate the academically gifted. It’s the third point I am concerned about for the moment. Here is President Obama is his recent Osawatomie, Kansas, speech:

But we need to meet the moment. We’ve got to up our game. We need to remember that we can only do that together. It starts by making education a national mission — a national mission. Government and businesses, parents and citizens. In this economy, a higher education is the surest route to the middle class. The unemployment rate for Americans with a college degree or more is about half the national average. And their incomes are twice as high as those who don’t have a high school diploma. Which means we shouldn’t be laying off good teachers right now — we should be hiring them. We shouldn’t be expecting less of our schools –- we should be demanding more. We shouldn’t be making it harder to afford college — we should be a country where everyone has a chance to go and doesn’t rack up $100,000 of debt just because they went.

Obama’s words remind me of this passage in the book:

The problem begins with the message sent to young people that they should aspire to college no matter what. Some politicians are among the most visible offenders, treating every failure to go to college as an injustice that can be remedied by increasing government help.

Murray makes several points that dispute Obama:

1. Only 20 percent of all students have the academic ability to do college work without decreasing the difficulty level.

2. For the student who wants to become a hotel manager, journalist, software designer, farmer, hospital administrator, four years of class work at a brick-and-mortar college is unnecessary — especially if K-12 did a better job a providing a classical liberal education.

3. The income for the people in a wide variety of  occupations that do not require a college degree is higher than the average income for many occupations that do require a BA. For some, being an electrician is a better career path than being a middle-level manager, both in terms of wages and job satisfaction.

Now this is not to say education should end at high school. Certainly not, as Joel Kotkin points out in City Journal:

The shortage of industrial skills points to a wide gap between the American education system and the demands of the world economy. For decades, Americans have been told that the future lies in high-end services, such as law, and “creative” professions, such as software-writing and systems design. This has led many pundits to think that the only real way to improve opportunities for the country’s middle class is to increase its access to higher education.

That attitude is a relic of the post–World War II era, a time when a college education almost guaranteed you a good job. These days, the returns on higher education, particularly on higher education gained outside the elite schools, are declining, as they have been for about a decade.  …  The reason for the low rewards is that many of the skills learned in college are now in oversupply. … The oversupply of college-educated workers is especially striking when you contrast it with the growing shortage of skilled manufacturing workers.  …  Two-year colleges will be crucial to the effort to train skilled workers. One of these schools, Central Ohio Technical College, has recently expanded by 70 welding students and 50 aspiring machinists per year. Many of the college’s certificate programs are designed and partly funded by companies, which figure that they’re making a wise investment. …

Such shorter educational alternatives will become ever more important as industrial workers retire. The average skilled worker in the industries supplying the gas boom is in his mid-fifties. “At our plant, you have lots of people with 20 to 30 years’ experience,” says Kirk, who has three high-skill openings that he can’t fill. “But there’s no apprenticeship program—no way to fill the future growth. We are simply running out of people.”

print this page

5 Responses to “Why getting a good education and a good job doesn’t necessarily mean going to a four-year college”

  1. Porfirio Lacek says:

    Good policy makes a difference. With good policy, labor participation and economic activity will rebound quickly.

  2. TC says:

    It’s a popular idea these days that many jobs don’t require a college education to perform and succeed at the job, which may be true, but in a time when so many have four year degrees you can’t get a job above flipping burgers without a degree. Employers assume if you didn’t get a degree in this day and age it must be because you are lazy or stupid. I will work myself bloody and into the grave to make sure each of my children get a college education no matter what they decide to do with their lives. I have tried to move up in the world, but repeatedly get shot down once they discover I never finished my degree. When I am trying to pay a mortgage, pay for a quality education for my children and put food on the table there is no time or money left over to allow me to go back to college as some (current & potential) employers have suggested. If you care about your kids-MAKE them graduate college!

  3. heiweihong says:

    I agree with you~

  4. Allison says:

    The problem with Murray’s thesis is not that it’s false. It’s that Murray and those agreeing with him nearly always have those degrees, and typically want their own children to have them as well. The elite pundits, whether lib or conservative, come across as saying “YOUR kids don’t need to go to college” at the same time that they themselves spend immense blood and treasure getting their kids into the Ivies and pseudo-Ivies. Whether intentional or not, their argument has the side effect of lowering the competition against their own.

    Yes, empty credentialism is bad. College for all is bad. It’s a fallacy of composition. We should all sit down. You go first.

  5. Tim Ribota says:

    Beautiful article. As a person in education, I continually ask why are we so intent on “drilling” our kids. We’ve become so intent on raising “book smart”, we’ve forgotten the heart and soul of a really educated individual: a liberal education.

    Kudos.

    Tim

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


The American Enterprise Institute takes no institutional positions on policy advocacy or political campaigns. The views expressed on The Enterprise Blog represent those of the individual writers.

AEI